Duplicate listings (banknotes)

45 posts • viewed 371 times

» Quick access to the last post

From the request of a member
https://en.numista.com/forum/topic102078.html
and the existing topic for coins
https://en.numista.com/forum/topic61278.html

Hello,

This is a thread to report duplicates in the catalogue.

Please provide a link to the Numista page, and optionally provide information on which one should
be deleted and why. The team will handle your request as soon as time will permit us.

Once the issue is resolved, kindly edit your post to "done" to keep the thread short and clean.

Thank you,
The Numista Team
Done
Done
Done
Czech duplicate
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note202683.html (to be kept)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note231886.html (almost identical copy, users to be moved then to be deleted)
Just call me Bram

Oh! And do read my profile page before you open a swap ...
Done
Done
Kazakhstan P-18:

Delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note205158.html

Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note205149.html

Cheers!
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
Nigeria P#21
Keep
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note239531.html
Delete
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note232844.html
Worse image, wrong dates, wrong value.
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Here's a confusion of the Egypt 25 Piastres. One states it's a ND, which it's not, the other has barely any information. It's the same note, but the picks are different. Something's wrong here. It's a dupliate, but still not?

P# 42?
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note207217.html

P# 47?
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note204167.html
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
In regards to Egypt P# 42 and P# 47, Bank Note Museum explains that Pick duplicates some years in error. Difference in coat of arms on reverse of notes. http://www.banknote.ws/COLLECTION/countries/AFR/EGY/EGY0042.htm No Information on actual years of P# 47

Will
Quote: "Coinman48"​In regards to Egypt P# 42 and P# 47, Bank Note Museum explains that Pick duplicates some years in error. Difference in coat of arms on reverse of notes. http://www.banknote.ws/COLLECTION/countries/AFR/EGY/EGY0042.htm No Information on actual years of P# 47

​Will
​Cheers mate! This means that both pages are showing a P-47 banknote, since P-42 has two stars in the white middle field of the flag in the CoA. P-42 must then be for the United Arab Republic.
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
The first (higher grade) image of P-42 posted on Numista is actually P-47 & should be removed/deleted. The circulated image below (posted by "@Hakim") is P-42b and should remain.
https://sites.google.com/view/notaphilycculture/collecting-banknotes
Quote: "Serial_Number_8"​The first (higher grade) image of P-42 posted on Numista is actually P-47 & should be removed/deleted. The circulated image below (posted by "@Hakim") is P-42b and should remain.
​Correct. I have already made a change request.
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
Angola P-134
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note222869.html

Delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note222216.html

Angola P-121
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note237540.html

Delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note247661.html
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
Confusion about Angola P-96 and P-98, which both has two pages with both Picks. Maybe one page for both is fine, or one for each pick, but two for both seems a little much:

I'd say split them to one page for each pick. What do you think?
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
Rhodesia
Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note214666.html
Delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note202023.html
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
OK, I have a tripple here, which is due to people are combining more than one Pick in a listing, but only mention one of the picks.

This one is to keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note202025.html

And these ones to delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note204051.html, https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note248229.html

Thank you!
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
Haiti P# 200 double entry:

Keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note209179.html

Delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note229413.html
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
Any updates on any requests since October? 0:)
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
All requests above this post should be done except for the following:
Quote: "BramVB"​Czech duplicate
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note202683.html (to be kept)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note231886.html (almost identical copy, users to be moved then to be deleted)

I have a request pending for this.
Quote: "ngdawa"​Confusion about Angola P-96 and P-98, which both has two pages with both Picks. Maybe one page for both is fine, or one for each pick, but two for both seems a little much:


​I'd say split them to one page for each pick. What do you think?

I am leaning towards keeping them combined because the only major difference I can see is the date. To split them... perhaps I am missing something?
Quote: "ngdawa"​OK, I have a tripple here, which is due to people are combining more than one Pick in a listing, but only mention one of the picks.

​This one is to keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note202025.html

​And these ones to delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note204051.html, https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note248229.html

​Thank you!
It looks like the difference between P#31 and P#35 is the signature, and the difference between P#35 and P#39 is the watermark. Combining the pages makes sense to me; however, my main concern is with the current format of the year-lines. The difference between these three Pick numbers is not mentioned within them, which I would think is important. As well, there are not actually any year-lines for P#39.

I would suggest either including the Pick numbers on the individual year-lines (and explaining the difference in the comments section), or listing the differences on the year-lines themselves. The first would likely be less crowded, but I know you are not a fan of numbers in the year-lines.

Regardless: I sent a request to add the P#39 year-lines.
Quote: "Sulfur"
Quote: "ngdawa"​Confusion about Angola P-96 and P-98, which both has two pages with both Picks. Maybe one page for both is fine, or one for each pick, but two for both seems a little much:
​​
​​I'd say split them to one page for each pick. What do you think?
​​​I am leaning towards keeping them combined because the only major difference I can see is the date. To split them... perhaps I am missing something?
​I will take an exttra look, but I would suggest to combine them as well.
Quote: "Sulfur"
Quote: "ngdawa"​OK, I have a tripple here, which is due to people are combining more than one Pick in a listing, but only mention one of the picks.
​​
​​This one is to keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note202025.html
​​
​​And these ones to delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note204051.html, https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note248229.html
​​
​​Thank you!
​It looks like the difference between P#31 and P#35 is the signature, and the difference between P#35 and P#39 is the watermark. Combining the pages makes sense to me; however, my main concern is with the current format of the year-lines. The difference between these three Pick numbers is not mentioned within them, which I would think is important. As well, there are not actually any year-lines for P#39.

​I would suggest either including the Pick numbers on the individual year-lines (and explaining the difference in the comments section), or listing the differences on the year-lines themselves. The first would likely be less crowded, but I know you are not a fan of numbers in the year-lines.

​Regardless: I sent a request to add the P#39 year-lines.
​Well, when it's justified I have no problem adding picks in the date list, but sub-numbers I see no point when the date list is as neat as it is. If you want sub-numbers, just count "a, b, c, ..." until you reach your year. More than one line with same date but different signatures? Then simply count "1, 2, 3 ...". No need to mess it up when it's not necessary. Some listings have even three or four "912a" because the subs are not listed in SCWC, and then it's just getting ridiculous.

But here it's about the main picks, so here it's justified and I'm all for to add them in the comment field. :)

Cheers!
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
Quote
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
Quote
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
Quote: "ngdawa"​Confusion about Angola P-96 and P-98, which both has two pages with both Picks. Maybe one page for both is fine, or one for each pick, but two for both seems a little much:

​​
​​I'd say split them to one page for each pick. What do you think?
I have edited this listing now so both picks are in it, since it actually seems like it's only the signature that is the difference (except for the prefix combinatoon of 1 MQZ for Pick 96 vs. Aabd for Pick 98). But now we can saftely remove this one.
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
The requests for Angola and Rhodesia are both done. :)

EDIT: The Czech Republic request is also done (pages split).
Suriname:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note246155.html is already there, so please delete https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note254526.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note214971.html
and
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note214984.html
Please remove https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note211311.html from South Vietnam. It is a duplicate (in the wrong country) of https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note238257.html.
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Please remove https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note225451.html and https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note219481.html from Vietnam. They are duplicates (in the wrong country) of https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note235953.html and https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note235944.html.
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Please remove
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note220412.html
and
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note220416.html
These are duplicates of the entries in
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note221131.html
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Please remove
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note206163.html
It is a duplicate of part of
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note206161.html
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Please remove the 1979 dates from Angola P#110 (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note214789.html) and transfer members to P#114 (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note207993.html).
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
please merge these notes:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note225884.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note245339.html
Please merge this two:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note214971.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note214984.html
Please merge these two Algerian entries:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note209057.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note231831.html
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Please move members with this note (Bhutan P#16)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note217395.html
to here
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note204540.html
and delete the first. The second covers both P#16 and P#23, which only differ by the signature.
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Some German Notgeld duplicates to merge:

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note242962.html and https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note242965.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note237423.html and https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note212428.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note228173.html and https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note228174.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note216969.html and https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note278346.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note219126.html and https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note232576.html (one is with serial number and one without, but they should became variants within one entry)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note231367.html and https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note233858.html

Thanks :-)
Ethiopia 10 birr
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note268234.html (keep)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note264970.html (delete)
Master Coin Referee
Coin referee for CRI, GTM, HND, NIC, PAN, and SLV.

Revisor principal de monedas
Revisor de Numista para monedas de CRI, GTM, HND, NIC, PAN y SLV.

Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦 and Free Palestine 🇵🇸!
I still prefer individual threads using the ticket system--they are easier to track and more difficult to forget about.

All non-notgeld requests should be done now, save for the following:
Quote: "ceh2019"​Please remove
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note220412.html
​and
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note220416.html
​These are duplicates of the entries in
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note221131.html
Quote: "ceh2019"​Please remove
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note206163.html
​It is a duplicate of part of
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note206161.html
Quote: "ceh2019"​Please remove the 1979 dates from Angola P#110 (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note214789.html) and transfer members to P#114 (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note207993.html).
I have pending requests for these first.
And all notgelds should be done, save for the following:
Quote: "Silberschatz"https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note219126.html and https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note232576.html (one is with serial number and one without, but they should became variants within one entry)

​I send a request for this one first.
Quote: "Sulfur"​I still prefer individual threads using the ticket system--they are easier to track and more difficult to forget about.



​Can I suggest then that we "de-pin" this thread from the top of the forum?
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
A while ago, I did ask for a different thread to be unpinned, but a new one took its place. Regardless, I would be happy with having this unpinned.

With that being said, these types of threads are not inherently bad--it just comes down to preferences of the master referees, I'd think. The equivalent coin threads work because there are people who regularly deal with them. If we were to get a banknote master referee who likes these types of threads, a thread like this would be efficiant, but it seems to not be the case right now.
@Sulfur: I did all your notgeld requests, thank you :-)

» Forum policy

Used time zone is UTC+1:00.
Current time is 09:29.