ZacUK
Numista team
Joined: 3-Jan-2011
Posts: 12647
Posted: 14-Oct-2020, 18:41
#
Posted: 14-Oct-2020, 18:41
#
From the request of a member
https://en.numista.com/forum/topic102078.html
and the existing topic for
coins
https://en.numista.com/forum/topic61278.html
Hello,
This is a thread to report duplicates in the catalogue.
Please provide a link to the Numista page, and optionally provide information on which one should
be deleted and why. The team will handle your request as soon as time will permit us.
Once the issue is resolved, kindly edit your post to "done" to keep the thread short and clean.
Thank you,
The Numista Team
Coinman48
Joined: 16-Sep-2015
Posts: 1036
Posted: 17-Oct-2020, 01:49
#
Edited: 16-Dec-2020, 14:44
Posted: 17-Oct-2020, 01:49
#
Edited: 16-Dec-2020, 14:44
Done
Coinman48
Joined: 16-Sep-2015
Posts: 1036
Posted: 18-Oct-2020, 01:29
#
Edited: 16-Dec-2020, 14:46
Posted: 18-Oct-2020, 01:29
#
Edited: 16-Dec-2020, 14:46
Done
Coinman48
Joined: 16-Sep-2015
Posts: 1036
Posted: 18-Oct-2020, 01:42
#
Edited: 16-Dec-2020, 14:47
Posted: 18-Oct-2020, 01:42
#
Edited: 16-Dec-2020, 14:47
Done
BramVB
Joined: 17-Jul-2016
Posts: 1173
Posted: 18-Oct-2020, 10:39
#
Posted: 18-Oct-2020, 10:39
#
Just call me Bram
Oh! And do read my profile page before you open a swap ...
Coinman48
Joined: 16-Sep-2015
Posts: 1036
Posted: 21-Oct-2020, 02:34
#
Edited: 16-Dec-2020, 14:43
Posted: 21-Oct-2020, 02:34
#
Edited: 16-Dec-2020, 14:43
Done
Coinman48
Joined: 16-Sep-2015
Posts: 1036
Posted: 21-Oct-2020, 03:40
#
Edited: 16-Dec-2020, 14:48
Posted: 21-Oct-2020, 03:40
#
Edited: 16-Dec-2020, 14:48
Done
ngdawa
Joined: 18-Oct-2011
Posts: 5587
Posted: 21-Oct-2020, 17:58
#
Posted: 21-Oct-2020, 17:58
#
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
ceh2019
Joined: 4-Jan-2019
Posts: 2416
Posted: 26-Oct-2020, 21:15
#
Posted: 26-Oct-2020, 21:15
#
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
ngdawa
Joined: 18-Oct-2011
Posts: 5587
Posted: 14-Nov-2020, 12:43
#
Posted: 14-Nov-2020, 12:43
#
Here's a confusion of the Egypt 25 Piastres. One states it's a ND, which it's not, the other has barely any information. It's the same note, but the picks are different. Something's wrong here. It's a dupliate, but still not?
P# 42?
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note207217.html
P# 47?
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note204167.html
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
Coinman48
Joined: 16-Sep-2015
Posts: 1036
Posted: 14-Nov-2020, 14:27
#
Posted: 14-Nov-2020, 14:27
#
In regards to Egypt P# 42 and P# 47, Bank Note Museum explains that Pick duplicates some years in error. Difference in coat of arms on reverse of notes.
http://www.banknote.ws/COLLECTION/countries/AFR/EGY/EGY0042.htm No Information on actual years of P# 47
Will
ngdawa
Joined: 18-Oct-2011
Posts: 5587
Posted: 14-Nov-2020, 16:13
#
Posted: 14-Nov-2020, 16:13
#
Quote: "Coinman48"In regards to Egypt P# 42 and P# 47, Bank Note Museum explains that Pick duplicates some years in error. Difference in coat of arms on reverse of notes. http://www.banknote.ws/COLLECTION/countries/AFR/EGY/EGY0042.htm No Information on actual years of P# 47
Will
Cheers mate! This means that both pages are showing a P-47 banknote, since P-42 has two stars in the white middle field of the flag in the CoA. P-42 must then be for the United Arab Republic.
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
Serial_Number_8
Joined: 2-May-2020
Posts: 1145
Posted: 15-Nov-2020, 15:52
#
Posted: 15-Nov-2020, 15:52
#
The first (higher grade) image of P-42 posted on Numista is actually P-47 & should be removed/deleted. The circulated image below (posted by "@Hakim") is P-42b and should remain.
ngdawa
Joined: 18-Oct-2011
Posts: 5587
Posted: 15-Nov-2020, 16:23
#
Posted: 15-Nov-2020, 16:23
#
Quote: "Serial_Number_8"The first (higher grade) image of P-42 posted on Numista is actually P-47 & should be removed/deleted. The circulated image below (posted by "@Hakim") is P-42b and should remain.
Correct. I have already made a change request.
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
ngdawa
Joined: 18-Oct-2011
Posts: 5587
Posted: 24-Nov-2020, 20:40
#
Posted: 24-Nov-2020, 20:40
#
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
ngdawa
Joined: 18-Oct-2011
Posts: 5587
Posted: 24-Nov-2020, 23:18
#
Posted: 24-Nov-2020, 23:18
#
Confusion about Angola P-96 and P-98, which both has two pages with both Picks. Maybe one page for both is fine, or one for each pick, but two for both seems a little much:
I'd say split them to one page for each pick. What do you think?
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
ngdawa
Joined: 18-Oct-2011
Posts: 5587
Posted: 25-Nov-2020, 10:54
#
Posted: 25-Nov-2020, 10:54
#
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
ngdawa
Joined: 18-Oct-2011
Posts: 5587
Posted: 25-Nov-2020, 11:12
#
Posted: 25-Nov-2020, 11:12
#
OK, I have a tripple here, which is due to people are combining more than one Pick in a listing, but only mention one of the picks.
This one is to
keep:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note202025.html
And these ones to delete:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note204051.html,
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note248229.html
Thank you!
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
ngdawa
Joined: 18-Oct-2011
Posts: 5587
Posted: 1-Dec-2020, 11:38
#
Posted: 1-Dec-2020, 11:38
#
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
ngdawa
Joined: 18-Oct-2011
Posts: 5587
Posted: 5-Dec-2020, 15:46
#
Edited: 7-Dec-2020, 22:48
Posted: 5-Dec-2020, 15:46
#
Edited: 7-Dec-2020, 22:48
Any updates on any requests since October?
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
Idolenz
Joined: 13-Jul-2013
Posts: 6591
Posted: 10-Dec-2020, 11:34
#
Edited: 11-Dec-2020, 14:57
Posted: 10-Dec-2020, 11:34
#
Edited: 11-Dec-2020, 14:57
Sulfur
Joined: 11-Jun-2016
Posts: 3690
Posted: 16-Dec-2020, 02:59
#
Posted: 16-Dec-2020, 02:59
#
All requests above this post should be done except for the following:
Quote: "BramVB"Czech duplicate
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note202683.html (to be kept)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note231886.html (almost identical copy, users to be moved then to be deleted)
I have a request pending for this.
Quote: "ngdawa"Confusion about Angola P-96 and P-98, which both has two pages with both Picks. Maybe one page for both is fine, or one for each pick, but two for both seems a little much:
I'd say split them to one page for each pick. What do you think?
I am leaning towards keeping them combined because the only major difference I can see is the date. To split them... perhaps I am missing something?
Quote: "ngdawa"OK, I have a tripple here, which is due to people are combining more than one Pick in a listing, but only mention one of the picks.
This one is to keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note202025.html
And these ones to delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note204051.html, https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note248229.html
Thank you!
It looks like the difference between P#31 and P#35 is the signature, and the difference between P#35 and P#39 is the watermark. Combining the pages makes sense to me; however, my main concern is with the current format of the year-lines. The difference between these three Pick numbers is not mentioned within them, which I would think is important. As well, there are not actually any year-lines for P#39.
I would suggest either including the Pick numbers on the individual year-lines (and explaining the difference in the comments section), or listing the differences on the year-lines themselves. The first would likely be less crowded, but I know you are not a fan of numbers in the year-lines.
Regardless: I sent a request to add the P#39 year-lines.
ngdawa
Joined: 18-Oct-2011
Posts: 5587
Posted: 16-Dec-2020, 10:02
#
Edited: 16-Dec-2020, 10:03
Posted: 16-Dec-2020, 10:02
#
Edited: 16-Dec-2020, 10:03
Quote: "Sulfur"Quote: "ngdawa"Confusion about Angola P-96 and P-98, which both has two pages with both Picks. Maybe one page for both is fine, or one for each pick, but two for both seems a little much:
I'd say split them to one page for each pick. What do you think?
I am leaning towards keeping them combined because the only major difference I can see is the date. To split them... perhaps I am missing something?
I will take an exttra look, but I would suggest to combine them as well.
Quote: "Sulfur"Quote: "ngdawa"OK, I have a tripple here, which is due to people are combining more than one Pick in a listing, but only mention one of the picks.
This one is to keep: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note202025.html
And these ones to delete: https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note204051.html, https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note248229.html
Thank you!
It looks like the difference between P#31 and P#35 is the signature, and the difference between P#35 and P#39 is the watermark. Combining the pages makes sense to me; however, my main concern is with the current format of the year-lines. The difference between these three Pick numbers is not mentioned within them, which I would think is important. As well, there are not actually any year-lines for P#39.
I would suggest either including the Pick numbers on the individual year-lines (and explaining the difference in the comments section), or listing the differences on the year-lines themselves. The first would likely be less crowded, but I know you are not a fan of numbers in the year-lines.
Regardless: I sent a request to add the P#39 year-lines.
Well, when it's justified I have no problem adding picks in the date list, but sub-numbers I see no point when the date list is as neat as it is. If you want sub-numbers, just count "a, b, c, ..." until you reach your year. More than one line with same date but different signatures? Then simply count "1, 2, 3 ...". No need to mess it up when it's not necessary. Some listings have even three or four "912a" because the subs are not listed in SCWC, and then it's just getting ridiculous.
But here it's about the main picks, so here it's justified and I'm all for to add them in the comment field.
Cheers!
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
ngdawa
Joined: 18-Oct-2011
Posts: 5587
Posted: 16-Dec-2020, 13:30
#
Edited: 16-Dec-2020, 13:31
Posted: 16-Dec-2020, 13:30
#
Edited: 16-Dec-2020, 13:31
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
ngdawa
Joined: 18-Oct-2011
Posts: 5587
Posted: 16-Dec-2020, 13:30
#
Posted: 16-Dec-2020, 13:30
#
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
ngdawa
Joined: 18-Oct-2011
Posts: 5587
Posted: 16-Dec-2020, 13:37
#
Posted: 16-Dec-2020, 13:37
#
Quote: "ngdawa"Confusion about Angola P-96 and P-98, which both has two pages with both Picks. Maybe one page for both is fine, or one for each pick, but two for both seems a little much:
I'd say split them to one page for each pick. What do you think?
I have edited
this listing now so both picks are in it, since it actually seems like it's only the signature that is the difference (except for the prefix combinatoon of
1 MQZ for Pick 96 vs.
Aabd for Pick 98). But now we can saftely remove
this one.
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
Sulfur
Joined: 11-Jun-2016
Posts: 3690
Posted: 17-Dec-2020, 21:31
#
Edited: 20-Dec-2020, 19:59
Posted: 17-Dec-2020, 21:31
#
Edited: 20-Dec-2020, 19:59
The requests for Angola and Rhodesia are both done.
EDIT: The Czech Republic request is also done (pages split).
griff88
Joined: 28-Jul-2020
Posts: 93
Posted: 24-Dec-2020, 09:49
#
Posted: 24-Dec-2020, 09:49
#
alamir
Joined: 29-Jan-2013
Posts: 1022
Posted: 5-Jan-2021, 11:33
#
Posted: 5-Jan-2021, 11:33
#
ceh2019
Joined: 4-Jan-2019
Posts: 2416
Posted: 6-Feb-2021, 20:23
#
Posted: 6-Feb-2021, 20:23
#
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
ceh2019
Joined: 4-Jan-2019
Posts: 2416
Posted: 6-Feb-2021, 20:26
#
Posted: 6-Feb-2021, 20:26
#
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
ceh2019
Joined: 4-Jan-2019
Posts: 2416
Posted: 20-Feb-2021, 12:10
#
Posted: 20-Feb-2021, 12:10
#
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
ceh2019
Joined: 4-Jan-2019
Posts: 2416
Posted: 20-Feb-2021, 12:11
#
Posted: 20-Feb-2021, 12:11
#
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
ceh2019
Joined: 4-Jan-2019
Posts: 2416
Posted: 24-Feb-2021, 20:22
#
Posted: 24-Feb-2021, 20:22
#
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
alamir
Joined: 29-Jan-2013
Posts: 1022
Posted: 4-Mar-2021, 08:03
#
Posted: 4-Mar-2021, 08:03
#
Silberschatz
Joined: 19-Dec-2013
Posts: 276
Posted: 5-Mar-2021, 09:25
#
Posted: 5-Mar-2021, 09:25
#
ceh2019
Joined: 4-Jan-2019
Posts: 2416
Posted: 5-Mar-2021, 12:59
#
Posted: 5-Mar-2021, 12:59
#
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
ceh2019
Joined: 4-Jan-2019
Posts: 2416
Posted: 13-Mar-2021, 14:36
#
Posted: 13-Mar-2021, 14:36
#
Please move members with this note (Bhutan P#16)
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note217395.html
to here
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note204540.html
and delete the first. The second covers both P#16 and P#23, which only differ by the signature.
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Silberschatz
Joined: 19-Dec-2013
Posts: 276
Posted: 18-Mar-2021, 09:11
#
Posted: 18-Mar-2021, 09:11
#
Some_Nerd
Numista team
Joined: 22-Apr-2019
Posts: 843
Posted: 18-Mar-2021, 18:16
#
Posted: 18-Mar-2021, 18:16
#
Master Coin Referee
Coin referee for CRI, GTM, HND, NIC, PAN, and SLV.
Revisor principal de monedas
Revisor de Numista para monedas de CRI, GTM, HND, NIC, PAN y SLV.
Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦 and Free Palestine 🇵🇸!
Sulfur
Joined: 11-Jun-2016
Posts: 3690
Posted: 19-Mar-2021, 17:19
#
Posted: 19-Mar-2021, 17:19
#
I still prefer individual threads using the ticket system--they are easier to track and more difficult to forget about.
All non-notgeld requests should be done now, save for the following:
Quote: "ceh2019"Please remove
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note220412.html
and
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note220416.html
These are duplicates of the entries in
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note221131.html
Quote: "ceh2019"Please remove
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note206163.html
It is a duplicate of part of
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note206161.html
Quote: "ceh2019"Please remove the 1979 dates from Angola P#110 (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note214789.html) and transfer members to P#114 (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note207993.html).
I have pending requests for these first.
Sulfur
Joined: 11-Jun-2016
Posts: 3690
Posted: 19-Mar-2021, 17:28
#
Posted: 19-Mar-2021, 17:28
#
And all notgelds should be done, save for the following:
Quote: "Silberschatz"https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note219126.html and https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note232576.html (one is with serial number and one without, but they should became variants within one entry)
I send a request for this one first.
ceh2019
Joined: 4-Jan-2019
Posts: 2416
Posted: 19-Mar-2021, 18:54
#
Posted: 19-Mar-2021, 18:54
#
Quote: "Sulfur"I still prefer individual threads using the ticket system--they are easier to track and more difficult to forget about.
Can I suggest then that we "de-pin" this thread from the top of the forum?
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Sulfur
Joined: 11-Jun-2016
Posts: 3690
Posted: 19-Mar-2021, 19:07
#
Posted: 19-Mar-2021, 19:07
#
A while ago, I did ask for a different thread to be unpinned, but a new one took its place. Regardless, I would be happy with having this unpinned.
With that being said, these types of threads are not inherently bad--it just comes down to preferences of the master referees, I'd think. The equivalent coin threads work because there are people who regularly deal with them. If we were to get a banknote master referee who likes these types of threads, a thread like this would be efficiant, but it seems to not be the case right now.
Silberschatz
Joined: 19-Dec-2013
Posts: 276
Posted: 22-Mar-2021, 10:33
#
Posted: 22-Mar-2021, 10:33
#
@Sulfur: I did all your notgeld requests, thank you :-)
Used time zone is UTC+1:00.
Current time is 09:29.