Should Bhutan Pice KM# 27 be split to two pages? [solved]

3 posts • viewed 55 times
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces17301.html

The 1 Pice coins with this design were minted in two years, 1951 and 1954, with 1954 using more detailed designs. And the two issues were under different kings.

Should we create separate listings for the two issues, or just remove the King from the current listing?

(I have images for the 1951 if the type is split.)
Splitting coins with the same KM# reference isn't a good idea.
Splitting coins with the same KM number is perfectly acceptable--I just do not think it could be justified with this specific coin.

While one has more details than the other, that does not necessarily seem to be a major change (it seems more like a variety of the same type to me). And for there being two kings, we now have the ability to add multiple ruling authorities to one coin, which has been done with this piece. :)
Status changed to Solved (bjherbison, 17-Aug-2021, 00:45)

» Forum policy

Used time zone is UTC+1:00.
Current time is 12:10.