Proofreading of year of operation of Utrecht mint is required

5 posts • viewed 99 times

This message aims at: requesting the creation or the modification of a mint

Status: Rejected
Upvotes: 2
Downvotes: 2
The article about Utrecht mint https://en.numista.com/catalogue/mint.php?id=2093
states:
Dates of operation1010-1816
which is in inconsistency with the examples: the coins can not be produced by a mint, when it does not exist.

Can the dates of operation be corrected?
Alexander from Cyprus
http://eucoins.byethost9.com/
My suggestions https://t.me/enjoyyourcollection
From the Dutch wiki page (https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koninklijke_Nederlandse_Munt):
  • The city of Utrecht got minting rights in 936 AD, and shortly thereafter, a mint house was established.
  • Between 1529-1567 minting was suspended.
  • After the establishment of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in 1814, the mint was baptized Rijks Munt (State mint), but it became a real state owned company only in 1912.
  • In 1994 the mint was privatized (with the Dutch state as the only share holder) and renamed Nederlandse Munt, and from 1999 onwards Koninklijke Nederlandse Munt (Royal Dutch Mint).
  • As a consequence of serious financial problems, the Dutch state sold its participation in the RDM to a Belgian investment group in 2016.
Status changed to Rejected (Jarcek, 5-Jun-2021, 09:40)
There are many mints like that. It simply states that coins were minted in Utrecht.
Catalogue administrator
We have excellent data collection
Quote: "ArnoV"​From the Dutch wiki page (https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koninklijke_Nederlandse_Munt):

  • The city of Utrecht got minting rights in 936 AD, and shortly thereafter, a mint house was established.

    ...


which may be used by Numista Authorities to correct the data. Till now the dates of operation are not corrected and the article is fake.

Dates of operation 1010-1816
wikidata do not explain why the mint which worked till 1816 produced for example the third coin in the
Coins produced in this mint section
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces22152.html
which can not be created before 1822

One more absurd production by His Majesty (https://en.numista.com/forum/topic51669.html) on the Numista catalog.
Alexander from Cyprus
http://eucoins.byethost9.com/
My suggestions https://t.me/enjoyyourcollection
Quote: "cyprusalexander"​The article about Utrecht mint https://en.numista.com/catalogue/mint.php?id=2093
​states:
​Dates of operation1010-1816
​which is in inconsistency with the examples: the coins can not be produced by a mint, when it does not exist.

​Can the dates of operation be corrected?

​Instead of always being so negative, why can't you just make a positive insert like a Change Request with the proper data?
Globetrotter
Coin varieties in French:
https://monnaiesetvarietes.numista.com

» Forum policy

Used time zone is UTC+1:00.
Current time is 12:44.