tony_k_1965
Joined: 8-Nov-2011
Posts: 1690
Posted: 21-Apr-2013, 19:59
#
Posted: 21-Apr-2013, 19:59
#
When it mentions 15 shields does this mean full shields or both full and part shields
ZacUK
Numista team
Joined: 3-Jan-2011
Posts: 12648
Posted: 21-Apr-2013, 23:52
#
Posted: 21-Apr-2013, 23:52
#
tony_k_1965
Joined: 8-Nov-2011
Posts: 1690
Posted: 22-Apr-2013, 00:22
#
Posted: 22-Apr-2013, 00:22
#
Cheers Zac, I have also noticed on km# 130 that it states in brackets that Konink end with a G this is actual incorrect.
ZacUK
Numista team
Joined: 3-Jan-2011
Posts: 12648
Posted: 22-Apr-2013, 01:19
#
Posted: 22-Apr-2013, 01:19
#
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces5534.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces3367.html
On the KM# 130 page it was pointing out that KM# 131 has the correct spelling with G
So KM# 130 is an error coin as it has KONINK (and if someone has KONING they have KM# 131)
tony_k_1965
Joined: 8-Nov-2011
Posts: 1690
Posted: 22-Apr-2013, 09:20
#
Posted: 22-Apr-2013, 09:20
#
Quote: ZacUKhttps://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces5534.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces3367.html
On the KM# 130 page it was pointing out that KM# 131 has the correct spelling with G
So KM# 130 is an error coin as it has KONINK (and if someone has KONING they have KM# 131)
From what I can gather the difference between the 2 is the amount of shields and not the spelling error.
ZacUK
Numista team
Joined: 3-Jan-2011
Posts: 12648
Posted: 22-Apr-2013, 10:00
#
Posted: 22-Apr-2013, 10:00
#