Most probably the article
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces1109.html
in the year distribution has the bug.
Instead of
1934 D 7,480,000
1935 5 8,264,000
1935 double die reverse; rare
1935 D 12,092,000 large "D"
1935 D small "D"
there should be
1934 D 7,480,000 small "D"
1934 D large "D"
1935 58,264,000
1935 double die reverse; rare
1935 D12,092,000
Despite of been scarce, it is recommended to start with small "D" in 1934 for it represents the change of the size chronologically. The small "D" was in 1917-1934 and large "D" in 1934-1938.