Replacement notes

21 posts • viewed 177 times

» Quick access to the last post

Why do you think, should replacement botes have their own entries or just be a variety metioned in the year list?
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
I'd definitely vote for putting them in the "year" list.
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Replacement & Specimen notes should be listed separately.

Aidan.
I personally think that specimens can be listed seperately since they differ in their fearures (often overstamped and all 0's in serialnumber etc), but if replacements are listed seperately I believe that at least 50% of all owners will have the regular note since it's just the prefix letter(s) and/or a star in serial number that differs. Not everyone will see this if there's two listings (even if it says "replacement" in the title - as you can see on colnect). But this is just me, I just want to hear what you guys have to say about it too
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
I say in the year list like proofs and essays for coins.

Will
On my opinion, replacement and specimens are variations on the same note, cause replacements are to replace defective notes, and should not have other differences than the identification of what they are. Also specimens are just to show the notes, but they have no currency value (in spite usually they are more valuable than regular notes), and usually they have "00000..." serial number to show it, and also many times are overprinted "Specimen", "Muestra" or so. I think they should be listed all in same page, together with variants. I also suggest to add in comments there should be listed the differences making the variants (different signatures, watermarks, year of issue, etc.).

If there are significant variations, then they are patterns, trials, or something similar, and in such case should be listed separately.
Just 10 options: you understand binary, or you don't.
Catalog Referee Coins, Banknotes & Exonumia: Uruguay, Cuba, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Paraguay, Costa Rica, Venezuela, Panama, Ecuador, Zamunda, Parva Domus and more.
In the year lists. That's how Pick and TBB list them as well. That's how I am approving them for the time being.
Library Media Specialist, columnist, collector, and gardener...
Replacement notes should be treated as Proof Coins in the Coin Database Listed alongside
of the Standard Issue as only the Number is of any significance to its value otherwise its exactly the Same Note.
Replacements will be listed as a line on a main page. They will not have their own page for now.
Library Media Specialist, columnist, collector, and gardener...
Quote: "Oklahoman"​Replacements will be listed as a line on a main page. They will not have their own page for now.
​I agree! Thanks.
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
Quote: "Oklahoman"​Replacements will be listed as a line on a main page. They will not have their own page for now.

Eventually, they should, as we want to educate fellow collectors how to identify Replacement notes.

The same thing also applies with Specimen notes.

Of course, the letters 'R' & 'S' should be appended like this - 'P1R' & 'P1S' to distinguish them from 'P1', which is the catalogue number of a normal note type.

Aidan.
Pick lists replacements as P1r1, P1r2, etc. (see Denmark P45) and lists specimens as P1s. I see no problem with doing that when listing Pick numbers.

Will
Aiden is right. The line should have the designation of r and s to indicate its status as replacement or specimen.
Library Media Specialist, columnist, collector, and gardener...
Quote: "Coinman48"​Pick lists replacements as P1r1, P1r2, etc. (see Denmark P45) and lists specimens as P1s. I see no problem with doing that when listing Pick numbers.

​Will


Will, using a small 'r' creates confusion - as it should be for notes that exist as unissued remainders.

I prefer to use a capital 'R' for 'Replacement' & a capital 'S' for 'Specimen'.

Aidan.
Aidan, I am far from an expert on banknotes and their cataloging and I have depended on the Pick system for my information. How can one tell they have unissued remainders and what is the authority for a small "r" to designate them? It makes sense to me to use the Pick system as most collectors will be using it and see no problem in having small "r" and "s" reserved for replacements and specimens. I don't see the need to designate unissued remainders and we certainly should not corrupt the system when designating "P#" before a number. It is unethical as well as probably illegal. The main issue is not "P# 1" but "P# 1a" when "r" and "s" are used with a number. If we are not going to use P numbers correctly, we should not designate them.

Will
Please be aware that it is not P# but P-. It is "pick 7" not "pick number 7", so no # sign should be used.
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
Xavier's template creates a P# ## so It seems like P # or P-# or even the way I have done it for decades, P#111 is acceptable until a numista rule is in place.

Some websites even use a format that has no space, hyphen, or #.

As far as replacement notes and specimen notes, lower case is how the indications appear in general catalogs. Do they appear in specialized catalogs when referring to Pick Numbers?
Library Media Specialist, columnist, collector, and gardener...
Quote: "Oklahoman"​Xavier's template creates a P# ## so It seems like P # or P-# or even the way I have done it for decades, P#111 is acceptable until a numista rule is in place.

​P1, P-1, P 1 are all okay, but it's not P# - even though that is the standard for now (probably since all coin catalogues has # in their listings).
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE
I am curious why you think it is not the right way. It is every bit as valid as the others. Moreover it is the default. You seem awful adamant I am just curious for your basis.
Library Media Specialist, columnist, collector, and gardener...
Replacement notes should definitely be listed along with the regular notes. The only thing about them is that they have a symbol or letter (in Canada, a * or X) to indicate that they happened to replace a bunch of defective notes with the same serial numbers.

There are series for which there happens to have been no needs to print replacement notes, for example the 1954 Canadian series for the $50, $100, and $1000 denominations.

The authorities in charge don't plan to print replacement notes intentionally; they just do it when or if required.

On to something else: We obviously could add a number of banknote catalogues, for example:

Ch-CGPM = Charlton-Canadian Government Paper Money.
₱o$₮ag€ $₮am₱$ a₹€ mo₹€ £€₲i₮ima₮€ a$ a ƒo₹m oƒ ¢u₹₹€nc¥ ₮ha₦ ₮h€ €₦₮i₹€ "¢oi₦" ₱₹odu¢₮io₦ oƒ ₦au₹u o₹ ₦iu€. ••• £€$ ₮im฿₹€$-₱o$₮€ $o₦₮ ₱£u$ £é₲i₮im€$ €₦ ₮a₦t qu'o฿j€₮$ mo₦é₮ai₹€$ qu€ £a ₱₹odu¢₮io₦ €₦₮iè₹€ d€ «mo₦₦ai€$» d€ ₦au₹u ou d€ ₦iu€.
Quote: "Oklahoman"​I am curious why you think it is not the right way. It is every bit as valid as the others. Moreover it is the default. You seem awful adamant I am just curious for your basis.
​Sorry mate!
Coin referee for: AZE, FRO, GRL, US-HI, KOR, KGZ, MLI, MHL, MMR, PRK, UZB, SML, TAT, TWN, TJK
Banknote referee for: AGO, AZE, BLR, ECS, GEO, HTI, KAZ, KGZ, KOR, MNG, MRT, PMR, PRK, ROK, SWE, TJK, TKM, TUR, UZB, WSM, ZWE

» Forum policy

Used time zone is UTC+1:00.
Current time is 02:39.