allexis
Joined: 25 Jun 2014
Posts: 1301
Posted: 23 Sep 2020, 03:07
#
Oklahoman
Numista team
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 3118
Posted: 24 Sep 2020, 08:24
#
Posted: 24 Sep 2020, 08:24
#
Should we delete the other way round? The listing you recommend to be deleted has it broken down by dates....
Library Media Specialist, columnist, collector, and gardener...
Idolenz
Catalogue referee
Joined: 13 Jul 2013
Posts: 9568
Posted: 24 Sep 2020, 09:43
#
Edited: 24 Sep 2020, 09:44
Posted: 24 Sep 2020, 09:43
#
Edited: 24 Sep 2020, 09:44
In most cases neither should be simply deleted both should be combined so that we don't lose information. I have seen this too many times that little to no migration of data takes place (although in this case there wouldn't be much lost but still, not good in my eyes).
allexis
Joined: 25 Jun 2014
Posts: 1301
Posted: 24 Sep 2020, 18:54
#
Edited: 24 Sep 2020, 18:55
Posted: 24 Sep 2020, 18:54
#
Edited: 24 Sep 2020, 18:55
Ok look at this. The first listing that has broken down dates consist of P 884, 888, and 892. This notes have their own entries in the catalog,
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note232355.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note232358.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note232362.html
By deleting the other way around
you will still have 888 and 892 with their own entries and same P# as broken down dates of this
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/note226556.html
I don't know if I made myself clear.
Also this should stay in Russia -civil war issues until you guys find a way to organize it.
Oklahoman
Numista team
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 3118
Posted: 24 Sep 2020, 19:57
#
Posted: 24 Sep 2020, 19:57
#
Thanks.
Library Media Specialist, columnist, collector, and gardener...