The article
is full of mistakes.
Obverse
National arms within radiant circle with dates at right.
Where do you see a circle? Indeed? It is a spiral of a rocket orbit. Does Numista wish to write it for blinds? Or it was written by a blind?
Reverse
Value above radiant sun and the Monument to the Conquerors of Space, Moscow.
Where is Moscow on the coin? There is monument which is in that city, but there is no Moscow there.
Lettering:
10
КОПЕЕК
Can you count how many lines are in the original text? Really? Is it one? Or two?
Check the translation:
Translation: 10 Kopecks
Yes, you missed! The Numista believes that a reader should be tricked by this imitation.
Comments
Do you know what is it? No, you have to open the image to find out. It is not even polite for a reader. It must be informed in advance before opening a file what it is about.
But wait, let us open.
It is written by issuer that this is the set of jubilee coins dedicated to … what?
indeed Numista tried to hide the event. Numista named both the coin and the event
10 Kopecks October Revolution and 50th Anniversary of the October Revolution
but Authorities would never write that. It is the Great October Socialist Revolution.
If you look attentively at the image of the set you may notice that the coins are not prooflike at all! Indeed there were no such coins issued. The only option of mint set was brilliant uncirculated quality. At least if you may present this 10 kopecks coin in prooflike, you will become rich just by showing it for money to collectors.
What do we have?
Yes, the necessity to correct this absurd.
Let us try.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/contributions/voir_demande.php?id=5697583
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/contributions/voir_demande_date.php?id=5697584
Modification request
10 Kopecks (October Revolution)
Request date: 17th May 2022, 01:02 pm
Request state: Rejected by pejounet on 17th May 2022, 08:46 pm
Comment: caps letters vs translations, etc., etc., etc. same as usual
Title is fine and aligned with other similar coins iwthin the catalogue...
| Field | Given value |
|---|---|
| Title (en) | 10 Kopecks (Great October Socialist Revolution) |
| Commemorated event (en) | 50th Anniversary of the Great October Socialist Revolution |
| Obverse (head): Description with keywords (en) | Radiant coat of arms within spiral of rocket orbit with dates at right. |
| Reverse (back): Description with keywords (en) | Value above radiant sun and the Monument to the Conquerors of Space in Moscow. |
| Reverse (back): Translation of the lettering (en) | 10 KOPECKS |
| Comments (en) | Official mint set in brilliant uncirculated (BU) condition. www.rarecoins.ru |
Modification request
Soviet Union: 10 Kopecks (October Revolution)
Request date: 17th May 2022, 01:02 pm
Request state: Rejected by pejounet on 17th May 2022, 08:50 pm
Comment: see previous comment
| Fields | Submitted value |
|---|---|
| Year | 1967 |
| No date | |
| Issuing years: (start) | |
| Issuing years: (end) | |
| Mint letter | |
| Mintage | 211 000 |
| Comment (fr) | BU |
| Comment (en) | BU |
| Comment (es) |
Source: Just tiny correction in the name of the event (see the image https://en.numista.com/catalogue/images/57ff35acda494.jpg where it is given in English by the issuer), description of the sides and comment; there were no coins issued in proof-like condition, thus the mintage section is corrected.
I wonder why Numista insists on the fakes and guards them so hard?
It seems that the person who rejected can not even read, “the name of the event … is given in English by the issuer” and as we were informed, “ etc., etc., etc. ” Most probably because of personal blindness.
The phrase “Title is fine and aligned with other similar coins iwthin the catalogue...” could be a masterpiece of this blindness. Some time ago all hundreds and hundreds of articles in Russia shown the portrait of the leader as the Reverse, at the same time the Great Britain coinage always show the portrait of a local leader as Obverse. Finally this humiliation over Russia was stopped and now the portrait of the leader is Obverse. So Numista knows the cases, when “ aligned with other similar coins iwthin the catalogue...” were accepted as mistake, all corrected and finally again aligned. What stopped the referee to correct just two lines in these 5 coins then, so everything will be aligned in this particular case. Is it not so obvious? Or sorry, we do not discuss blindness, is it not so logic?
In which way these fakes can be removed from this and correspondent articles to make catalog consistent?
