I have an Indian paisa (20 mm diameter, ~6 mm thickness) that appears to be a match to this type (Muhammad Adil Shah Suri, 962 AH).
However, my example pretty clearly has the date 961 AH (1554 AD).
Sadly, since the coin is in a 2x2, I cannot yet make a proper photo of it (all my attempts got me only glare on the plastic).
There are three different examples on Zeno with the 961 date, all of which give the type as D1125. (All of them also appear to match mine.) I have no idea what the D stands for.
Zeno also has an example dated 962, with the same designation.
Unfortunately, I do not have the Dillip Rajgor catalogue handy, and neither of the Google Books versions is searchable (to me, anyway), so I have no idea how fine its type division is.
And all the searches for that specific reference only give Numista (plus occasionally a bunch of completely unrelated pages that happen to use the same letters and numbers).
As such - would it be correct to add the 961 (1554) date to the existing page, or would I need to start an entirely different page (due to a different catalog reference)?
If the former is the case, could any of the referees add the date, or do I need to make the request officially?
[Note: I have previously said that my coin is not listed on Numista. This is because I trusted the designation on the 2x2, whose owner apparently misread the date as 941 and thus attributed the coin to the Lodi dynasty. Once I figured out the correct date and correct dynasty, finding the coin was easy.]
(Mods: if this topic is in the wrong section, please move it. I thought this was the most correct audience for it, but something else might be better.)
